Site icon OverTells Gaming

Ernie Barnes Net Worth: What Is the Cost of His Paintings?

Ernie Barnes Net Worth

Ernie Barnes Net Worth:  Do you know the value of Ernest Eugene Barnes Jr. We spent 18 hours doing research on this issue (on Wikipedia, YouTube, in libraries, etc.) to review the post?

Celebrities’ total net worth as of the 2022 year Is around 104,4 million dollars.


Ernie Barnes Jr.’s knowledge Because I was born in Durham, North Carolina on July 15, 1938, I have the following information: Los Angeles, California, United States, April 27, 2009 Birthplace: Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.

6-foot-3-inches (1.91 m) Department of Fine Arts, Actor Janet Thaleen Norton (m. 1965–1983) and Bernadine Gradney (m. 1984–2009).

Andrea Burnett (m. 1957–1965) was a married woman from 1957 until 1965 Michael Barnes, Erin Barnes, Paige Barnes, and Sean Barnes are their children. Ernest E. Barnes, Sr., and Fannie Mae Geer are his parents.

Inches and Pounds

Ernie Barnes stands at a height of 1.71 m.
Ernie Barnes has a body mass index of 65 kg.


Ernest Eugene Barnes Jr., the future Ernie Barnes, was born on July 15, 1938, in Durham, North Carolina.

“Good Times” (1974), “Don’t Look Back: The Story of Leroy Satchel Paige” (1981), and “No. 1” (1969).

Berdine Gradney, Janet Thaleen Norton, and Andrea Burnett were all married to him. On the 27th of April, 2009, he passed away in Los Angeles.

Winning $15.3 Million at an Auction

In New York was the iconic “SUGAR SHACK” painting by the late great Ernie Barnes.

An African-American painter, Ernest “Ernie” Eugene Barnes, Jr. (July 15, 1938 – April 27, 2009) was widely regarded for his distinctive style of elongation and movement.

Football player, actor, and author are just a few of the many talents he held.

Related: Fred Ward Net Worth: What Is The Reason for His Death?

The Sugar Shack, painted in 1976 by ex-NFL star Ernie Barnes and featured prominently in the opening credits of the hit comedy Good Times, was auctioned off on Thursday for a whopping $15.3 million.

Marvin Gaye Used the Image on the Cover of His 1976 Album I Want You

This sold for 27 times more than any other piece in Barnes’ collection, and 76 times more than Christie’s original estimate of $200,000.

Energy trader Bill Perkins, 53, of Houston, Texas, won the iconic photograph after a 10-minute bidding war between 22 rival bidders.

“I STOLE IT—I WOULD HAVE PAID A LOT MORE,” PERKINS SAID AFTER THE AUCTION TO THE TIMES. This is more famous than the MONA LISA in some parts of America.

Because he didn’t want to take the chance of losing out on a painting of this stature over the phone.

He Made the Trip to New York Just for the Sale

What if Oprah shows up?” It occurred to him, “What if P. Diddy shows up?” “This artwork is out of my price range.”

The Sugar Shack transports viewers to a vibrant Black nightclub where revelers sway to the sounds of a band that includes a lead vocalist, saxophonist, trumpeter, guitarist, and drummer.

The partygoers’ limbs are spread and enlarged to show the groove and ecstatic buzz of the night in a larger-than-life scene.

As a trademark of Barnes’ work, nearly everyone is dancing with their eyes closed, which is believed to illustrate the artist’s slogan that “we are oblivious to one another’s humanity.”

It was painted in a style known as Black Romantic, and Barnes drew inspiration from his boyhood recollections of North Carolina, according to the site.

Perkins remarked, “You never saw paintings of Black people by Black artists.

“This was the first time that Barnes’ art was introduced to me and the rest of the country. It’s the only piece of art to ever accomplish that. All of this was a first.

Related: Bruce Macvittie Net Worth: What is The Reason For His Death?

In other words, this will never happen again. Ever. This piece has a cultural significance that’s out of this world.

Artist Kevin McCoy Sues Sotheby’s and Auction House Over $1.5M Sale

When Kevin McCoy’s Quantum (2014) was sold for $1.47 million at Sotheby’s “Natively Digital” auction. Some have referred to it as the first-ever NFT, making headlines.

This time, the sale is making headlines because a holdings business claims to own Quantum and issuing McCoy and the auction house.

The Canadian holding firm Free Holdings, whose owner was not named in the lawsuit, is the plaintiff in the case, which was filed last Thursday in the Southern District Court of New York.

When McCoy failed to renew his ownership of the NFT, Free Holdings claims it had the legal right to seize those rights for itself.

In Contrast to Other Nfts

Which are issued on Ethereum, McCoy’s Quantum was created using a blockchain application called NameCoin.

It’s called NameCoins, and it’s up to the owners to return them to the software every 250 days.

Claims in the suit state that the NFT was left unclaimed for years because McCoy allowed his ownership to expire.

Concerned about what it means to own something created with blockchain technology, the complaint is being pursued.

Blockchain technology is designed to provide a permanent and verifiable ledger of provenance, however, the mechanics of ownership are sometimes muddled by the transfer of content and ownership from one blockchain to another.

Related: Sharon Osbourne Net Worth 2022: What Is the Net Worth of Her Family?

When it comes to determining what ownership means in today’s digital world, this case has no precedence.

An Artist and Auction House Are Trying to Create a False Narrative

about the first NFT based on blockchain records, which are self-evident. However, the blockchain records cannot defend themselves in the face of these efforts, states the lawsuit.

McCoy sold an Ethereum-based NFT that he had coined of his work at the Sotheby’s auction, presumably transferring rights and ownership to this new NFT. The complainant argues that this is not the case, however.

When news of the Quantum auction first broke, the proprietor of Free Holdings registered to own the dormant name currency in April.

Issuing a citation to the suit The next day. The plaintiff started tweeting McCoy to let him know that he no longer owned the artist’s work.

Quantum NFT is in my possession,” the complainant, who goes by the handle @EarlyNFT, claimed in a tweet that included a link to their claim of ownership.

If the owner claims that they have the right to access metadata stored at a string of numbers and letters, Ledger Insights casts doubt on their claim.)

This may be similar to claiming ownership of a domain name that has expired.)

Defendants Engaged in Deceptive

It was alleged that the defendants engaged in deceptive and unlawful trade practices as well as commercial disparaging behavior in connection with Sotheby’s, McCoy.

The company that runs NameCoin in three separate lawsuits filed by the plaintiff.

Alex Amsel, who purchased Quantum and tweeted that he had purchased the NFT was also charged with the first and third offenses.

“The allegations in this litigation are unfounded, and Sotheby’s is prepared to strongly defend itself.”

A Sotheby’s spokeswoman said in a statement

“Kevin McCoy is a pioneer in the digital art industry,” a McCoy spokeswoman noted in an email to ARTnews.

Indisputable proof points to him as the author of the Quantum art that he and he alone developed and sold.

There has never been anyone by the name “EarlyNFT” who has claimed ownership of Kevin’s original NFT and associated art. To claim otherwise is offensive.”

The Nameless Company’s condition report, which said that the NFT had been “burned,” was also called into question in the case, which was filed against the Nameless Company.

There is no way to “delete” a Namecoin blockchain record, and there is no way to “remove” a Quantum blockchain record. While the blockchain record for Quantum is still active and controlled by Free Holdings,”

For More Information Please Visit Us: Overtells

Exit mobile version